Bees continuously threatened

Bees are still under threat despite the EU ban on three highly bee-toxic neonicotinoids. A loophole in the Pesticides Regulation (1) continues unlawfully allowing ‘emergency authorisations’ through which the national authorities may temporarily allow unauthorised pesticides to be used in the European Union.

In fact, according to the Article 53 of the Regulation, ‘emergency authorisations’ for banned or non-approved pesticides can only be used in ‘exceptional circumstances’, for example, when a danger to crops or the environment leaves the farmer or Member State with no other choice other than to use the pesticide. However, this mechanism is continuously being abused by EU Member States. According to PAN’s analysis and other publications (2), there has been an inconceivable increase in the number of “emergencies” throughout Europe over the last years. Many EU countries, including Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia, have issued so-called “emergency authorisations” to allow farmers to continue applying banned pesticides.

In our joint NGO letter, signed by local, national and European environmental and beekeeper organisations, we have raised a very serious concern that the Commission is not doing enough to discourage so-called “emergency authorisations” being granted as a routine response to EU bans, and outside “special circumstances”, as required by EU pesticides law.

PAN Europe, together with its members, is acting to initiate a number of court cases against these unlawful ‘emergency authorisations”. The pesticide regulation does not allow Member States to give a derogation for a pesticide that was proven toxic to human health or the environment. A judgement from end March in an environmental tribunal in Sweden has cancelled a derogation for the use of imidacloprid on sugar beet. Our colleagues from the Swedish Nature Conservation Council led the case and paved the way for other cases in Europe, such as the one PAN Europe and Nature et Progrès Belgium are currently leading on similar derogations given to neonicotinoid pesticides and sugar beet. Germany and the UK have rejected similar derogations for sugar beet because of the risk the use of neonicotinoids pose to the environment and because they consider it would not respect the pesticide legislation.

We call on Member States to implement EU’s legislation in good faith. As the Sustainable Use of Pesticides Directive indicates, chemical plant protection methods shall be used as a last resort, only if non-chemical alternatives prove to be inefficient. The abuse of the Member States is not only in contradiction with the EU legislation on pesticides, but is also a clear violation of the precautionary principle, a treaty commitment of the EU Member States.

Notes

(1) Regulation EC 1107/2009 – placing on the market of PPPs

(2)http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/615668/EPRS_STU(2018)615668_EN.pd

© PAN Europe, Rue de la Pacification 67, 1000, Brussels, Belgium, Tel. +32 2 318 62 55

PAN Europe gratefully acknowledges the financial support from the European Union, European Commission, DG Environment, Life+ programme. Sole responsibility for this publication lies with the authors and the funders are not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained herein.